Lorenzo Pee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 2:32 pm
I think one of the greatest disservices Jackson's films (as those films are nearly as prevalent in the mind of fans as the books) did to the orcs was assume that they all came out of vats of goo.
Much as I, in the usual course of events, enjoy to engage in a bit of judicious (and so richly deserved) Jackson-bashing, in this particular case, I shall make an exception and stand up to defend him ...
In my earlier post, I said,
Troelsfo wrote: ↑Sun May 17, 2020 3:09 pm
In the very first prose story of the legendarium, ‘The Fall of Gondolin’, this aspect was even clearer: “for all that race were bred by Melko of the subterranean heats and slime. Their hearts were of granite and their bodies deformed; foul their faces which smiled not, but their laugh that of the clash of metal, and to nothing were they more fain than to aid in the basest of the purposes of Melko.” The Book of Lost Tales 2 p. 159.
It is, indeed, very curious that Mr. Jackson and his cohorts should, surely by inadvertent accident, chance upon a picture that would, to this extent, reference the earliest versions of these foul creatures, and which was still in the main lines (if not in excruciating detail … see below[†]) – the version, indeed, which is actually most compatible with the most part of
The Lord of the Rings and which can even still be detected in some places in the published
Silmarillion, though Christopher Tolkien did a very excellent and commendable job in trying to align that book with the ‘Orcs are corrupted Elves’ position. A position, mind, that was neither Tolkien's first nor his last, and which presents a number of (mainly ethical) problems (which Tolkien himself was working with as can be seen in
Morgoth's Ring.
So, all in all, I have to stand up for Jackson and Walsh and their merry band of desecrators and abominationists on this count: in my considered view, their version of the breeding of Orcs is actually more faithful to the concepts that Tolkien held when writing the most of
The Lord of the Rings – I do not think that his views even
began to change until he reached the Stairs of Cirith Ungol.
[†] In the version of the
Quenta Silmarillion that immediately preceded the writing of
The Lord of the Rings the slimes were gone, but the Orcs were still brought into being by Morgoth, now in mockery of the Elves (as Treebeard indeed tells Pippin and Merry in
The Lord of the Rings, book III, chapter 4).
There countless became the hosts of his beasts and demons; and he brought into being the race of the Orcs, and they grew and multiplied in the bowels of the earth. These Orcs Morgoth made in envy and mockery of the Elves, and they were made of stone, but their hearts of hatred. Glamhoth, the hosts of hate, the Gnomes have called them. Goblins they may be called, but in ancient days they were strong and fell.
Tolkien, Christopher.
The Lost Road and Other Writings (
The History of Middle-earth, Book 5) (Kindle Locations 5027-5030). HarperCollins Publishers. Kindle Edition. p. 233.
Lorenzo Pee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 2:32 pm
There is language in the films to imply the existence of female orcs ("crossing orcs with goblin-men", "breeding an army", etc.) but visually they all seem to go out of their way to deny the existence of female orcs.
In a world of wizards and angelic beings, surely we can allow other ways of blending the races of Orcs and Men (to use Treebeard's phrasing). I am not sufficiently familiar with the language used in the films to say what Jackson & Cohorts made of Treebeard's vague terms, but I would definitely not be surprised to learn that they were … shall we just say, less careful than Tolkien in choosing words that would not too strongly avoid something different from what they had shown on screen …
Lorenzo Pee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 2:32 pm
There have to have been female orcs because the idea of a stew pot cloning tubs is stupid at best. I would also assume that orcs have a highly stratified and patriarchal society which would mean we'd never get to see a female orc in any context given to us within the books.
Well … I am, of course, sorry to see that you find Tolkien's idea stupid

but I actually think it was a mistake of Tolkien to go away from this idea – it is, in so many ways, a concept that is better aligned with the overall philosophy and ethics of his legendarium, and only mistaken (in my opinion) concerns for his personal faith brought him to move away from that instinctive concept.